Competitor profile

MAA NARMADA CONSTRUCTION

They win 29% of what they bid, and 33% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
21 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹4.8 Cr bid — 33.1% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
28.6%
64.3%
Awarded428.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected17.1%
Lost964.3%
By value₹4.8 Cr
33.1%
62.3%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr33.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹22.2 L4.6%
Lost₹3.0 Cr62.3%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Rajneesh Kumar1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹11.9 L
won head-to-head
02
MAN BAHADUR SINGH CONTRACTOR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
AKSHAT RAJ SAHU2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹19.5 L
won head-to-head
04
SPARKBUILD ASSOCIATES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹12.2 L
won head-to-head
05
Dubey Contruction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Nagar Infratech0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAA NARMADA awardedOthers

About MAA NARMADA CONSTRUCTION

MAA NARMADA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Madhya Pradesh Jal Nigam Maryadit, at 69.9% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Rajneesh Kumar, MAN BAHADUR SINGH CONTRACTOR and AKSHAT RAJ SAHU. Rajneesh Kumar bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MAA NARMADA CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.