Competitor profile

Maa Construction

They win 9% of what they bid, and 5% of the value they chase.

11tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
11 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
11
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹41.9 L
of ₹8.5 Cr bid — 4.9% conversion
Win rate
9.1%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
18.2%
72.7%
Awarded19.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected218.2%
Lost872.7%
By value₹8.5 Cr
44.0%
51.1%
Awarded₹41.9 L4.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.7 Cr44.0%
Lost₹4.3 Cr51.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
K - LINQ HOSMED (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
RAMESHWAR DHANRAJ CHAKOLE2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹65.3 L
won head-to-head
03
MICHAEL ENGINEERING WORKS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
CIS GLOBAL INFRATECH PVT LTD0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s S A JAIN1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹37.8 L
won head-to-head
06
Deesha constructions0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMaa Construction awardedOthers

About Maa Construction

Maa Construction appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 9.1% win rate — worth ₹41.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is All India Institute of Medical Science-Nagpur, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against K - LINQ HOSMED (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED, RAMESHWAR DHANRAJ CHAKOLE and MICHAEL ENGINEERING WORKS. K - LINQ HOSMED (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Maa Construction won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.