Competitor profile

MA Associates

They win 67% of what they bid — and 95% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
4 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹61.5 L
of ₹64.5 L bid — 95.3% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded266.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected133.3%
Lost00.0%
By value₹64.5 L
95.2%
Awarded₹61.5 L95.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.1 L4.8%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Directorate of Panchayat₹55.2 L89.9%
Local Self Government Department₹6.2 L10.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹61.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
LABRA IN BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS LLP0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
AKIL NASIM M0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MIDCOS LLP0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
HAPCONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SHILESH.T0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ANJAL.P0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMA Associates awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MA Associates

About MA Associates

MA Associates appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹61.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate of Panchayat, at 89.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against LABRA IN BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS LLP, AKIL NASIM M and MIDCOS LLP. LABRA IN BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS LLP bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; MA Associates won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.