Competitor profile

M/S M. T. ENTERPRISES

They win 13% of what they bid — and 59% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
22 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.2 Cr
of ₹12.2 Cr bid — 58.9% conversion
Win rate
12.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
12.5%
12.5%
75.0%
Awarded112.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected112.5%
Lost675.0%
By value₹12.2 Cr
58.8%
15.5%
25.6%
Awarded₹7.2 Cr58.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.9 Cr15.5%
Lost₹3.1 Cr25.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s L Kiranjoy Singh3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S YUMNAM PREMKUMAR SINGH2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
OASIS ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹5.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S L.N. TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ASHIF ENTERPRISE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.6 Cr
won head-to-head
06
OLIVE EXPORTS PVT.LTD.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM. T. ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to M. T. ENTERPRISES

About M/S M. T. ENTERPRISES

M/S M. T. ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 12.5% win rate — worth ₹7.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DG, Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s L Kiranjoy Singh, M/S YUMNAM PREMKUMAR SINGH and OASIS ENTERPRISES. M/s L Kiranjoy Singh bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/S M. T. ENTERPRISES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.