Competitor profile

M/S M S Constructions

They win 39% of what they bid, and 43% of the value they chase.

109tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
102
109 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
40
55 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹19.3 Cr
of ₹44.8 Cr bid — 43.1% conversion
Win rate
39.2%
of 102 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count102 bids
39.2%
53.9%
Awarded4039.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected76.9%
Lost5553.9%
By value₹44.8 Cr
43.1%
47.7%
Awarded₹19.3 Cr43.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.1 Cr9.2%
Lost₹21.4 Cr47.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

40 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S Ritu Tandon5 wins · 58 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s Ravi Traders6 wins · 50 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S RAJ KUMAR SINGH3 wins · 42 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
04
N K ENTERPRISES2 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹81.9 L
won head-to-head
05
Ms Vinay constructions2 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹74.5 L
won head-to-head
06
ROHIT ENTERPRISES3 wins · 25 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM S Constructions awardedOthers

About M/S M S Constructions

M/S M S Constructions appears as a bidder on 109 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 102 decided bids, it was awarded 40 — a 39.2% win rate — worth ₹19.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S Ritu Tandon, M/s Ravi Traders and M/S RAJ KUMAR SINGH. M/S Ritu Tandon bid on 58 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; M/S M S Constructions won 26.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.