Competitor profile

M.P.SUPPLY

They win 32% of what they bid, and 35% of the value they chase.

44tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
38
44 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
26 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.7 Cr
of ₹27.7 Cr bid — 34.9% conversion
Win rate
31.6%
of 38 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count38 bids
31.6%
68.4%
Awarded1231.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2668.4%
By value₹27.7 Cr
34.9%
65.1%
Awarded₹9.7 Cr34.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹18.1 Cr65.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

12 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Markson0 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
KAKWANI BUILDERS3 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SUNIL KUMAR VERMA0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S L R ENTERPRISE1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹78.5 L
won head-to-head
05
SNEH CORPORATION1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
S M STORE0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.P.SUPPLY awardedOthers

About M.P.SUPPLY

M.P.SUPPLY appears as a bidder on 44 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 38 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 31.6% win rate — worth ₹9.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Markson, KAKWANI BUILDERS and SUNIL KUMAR VERMA. Markson bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M.P.SUPPLY won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.