Competitor profile

M N NAIDU CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 23% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

16tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
15
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹67.3 L
of ₹2.9 Cr bid — 23.1% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count15 bids
33.3%
13.3%
53.3%
Awarded533.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected213.3%
Lost853.3%
By value₹2.9 Cr
23.1%
27.5%
49.4%
Awarded₹67.3 L23.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹80.4 L27.5%
Lost₹1.4 Cr49.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
T NARASIMHULU NAIDU0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Krishna Rao Madugula1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹18.5 L
won head-to-head
03
j srinivas4 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
KLB infinity private ltd0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
GURAYYA V NIMBALAGUNDI0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SRISHABDAYONI INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM N NAIDU awardedOthers

About M N NAIDU CONSTRUCTIONS

M N NAIDU CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹67.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Archaeological Survey of India, at 68.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against T NARASIMHULU NAIDU, Krishna Rao Madugula and j srinivas. T NARASIMHULU NAIDU bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M N NAIDU CONSTRUCTIONS won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.