Competitor profile

M. MOHAMMED

They win 45% of what they bid, and 37% of the value they chase.

29tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
17 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
29
29 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹30.6 L
of ₹82.9 L bid — 37.0% conversion
Win rate
44.8%
of 29 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count29 bids
44.8%
20.7%
34.5%
Awarded1344.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected620.7%
Lost1034.5%
By value₹82.9 L
37.0%
42.5%
20.5%
Awarded₹30.6 L37.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹35.2 L42.5%
Lost₹17.0 L20.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Local Self Government Department₹24.8 L80.9%
Forest Department₹5.9 L19.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹30.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Nishad M11 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹34.8 L
won head-to-head
02
NASSAR.K1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹1.8 L
won head-to-head
03
SHAMEEMURAHMAN1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹88,392
won head-to-head
04
SHAHUL HAMEED P V0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MUJEEB RAHMAN TK0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M.Abdul Hameed1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM. MOHAMMED awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to M. MOHAMMED

About M. MOHAMMED

M. MOHAMMED appears as a bidder on 29 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 29 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 44.8% win rate — worth ₹30.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 80.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Nishad M, NASSAR.K and SHAMEEMURAHMAN. Nishad M bid on 12 of the same tenders and won 11 of them; M. MOHAMMED won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.