Competitor profile

M. M. C. AND CO

They win 7% of what they bid, and 7% of the value they chase.

46tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
22 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
46
46 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
33 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 Cr
of ₹19.7 Cr bid — 6.8% conversion
Win rate
6.5%
of 46 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count46 bids
21.7%
71.7%
Awarded36.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1021.7%
Lost3371.7%
By value₹19.7 Cr
25.4%
67.8%
Awarded₹1.3 Cr6.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.0 Cr25.4%
Lost₹13.3 Cr67.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GAYATRI ENTERPRISE7 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹2.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
NICE INFOTECH4 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
ELECTRO FREEZE5 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹2.7 Cr
won head-to-head
04
SUDHA ENTERPRISES2 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹59.2 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S AVIJEET INTERNATIONAL1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹37.8 L
won head-to-head
06
SEN ELECTRIC WORKS4 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM. M. C. awardedOthers

About M. M. C. AND CO

M. M. C. AND CO appears as a bidder on 46 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 46 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 6.5% win rate — worth ₹1.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 11.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against GAYATRI ENTERPRISE, NICE INFOTECH and ELECTRO FREEZE. GAYATRI ENTERPRISE bid on 28 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; M. M. C. AND CO won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.