Competitor profile

M L Gupta Associates

They win 17% of what they bid, and 7% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
14 Oct 2024last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.2 Cr
of ₹31.3 Cr bid — 7.0% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
83.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost583.3%
By value₹31.3 Cr
93.0%
Awarded₹2.2 Cr7.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹29.1 Cr93.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹2.2 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
A.G.CONSTRUCTIONS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹4.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
, D.S.Rathore0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹3.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Madan Builders1 win · 1 shared tender
₹12.3 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Himachal Techno Engineers1 win · 1 shared tender
₹6.2 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM L Gupta awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to M L Gupta

About M L Gupta Associates

M L Gupta Associates appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹2.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Oct 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against A.G.CONSTRUCTIONS, , D.S.Rathore and achievement infrastructure pvt. limited. A.G.CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M L Gupta Associates won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.