Competitor profile

M.L. Enterprises

They win 23% of what they bid — and 41% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

57tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
21 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
56
57 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
28 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.7 Cr
of ₹11.3 Cr bid — 41.4% conversion
Win rate
23.2%
of 56 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count56 bids
23.2%
26.8%
50.0%
Awarded1323.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1526.8%
Lost2850.0%
By value₹11.3 Cr
41.3%
23.7%
34.9%
Awarded₹4.7 Cr41.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.7 Cr23.7%
Lost₹3.9 Cr34.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

13 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Anil Kumar Singh2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹72.1 L
won head-to-head
02
MAHAKAAL CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI5 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹18.0 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s Jitendra Enterprises0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M S ENTERPRISES5 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹93.7 L
won head-to-head
06
CHAITALI ENTERPRISES1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹2.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.L. Enterprises awardedOthers

About M.L. Enterprises

M.L. Enterprises appears as a bidder on 57 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 56 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 23.2% win rate — worth ₹4.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Central Coalfields Limited, at 98.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Anil Kumar Singh, MAHAKAAL CONSTRUCTION and SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI. Anil Kumar Singh bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M.L. Enterprises won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.