Competitor profile

M/s M.L Consortium

They win 10% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

110tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
12 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
109
110 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
91 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.6 Cr
of ₹42.8 Cr bid — 8.3% conversion
Win rate
10.1%
of 109 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count109 bids
10.1%
83.5%
Awarded1110.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected76.4%
Lost9183.5%
By value₹42.8 Cr
86.9%
Awarded₹3.6 Cr8.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.0 Cr4.8%
Lost₹37.2 Cr86.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

11 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S DEEDAR ENTERPRISE6 wins · 64 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s Gupta Construction7 wins · 50 shared tenders
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
03
MAHINDER ELECTRICALS6 wins · 48 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
S K ENTERPRISE6 wins · 47 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S BISWA CONSTRUCTION5 wins · 46 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S DIL SINGH BISWA AND CO4 wins · 38 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.L Consortium awardedOthers

About M/s M.L Consortium

M/s M.L Consortium appears as a bidder on 110 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 109 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 10.1% win rate — worth ₹3.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S DEEDAR ENTERPRISE, M/s Gupta Construction and MAHINDER ELECTRICALS. M/S DEEDAR ENTERPRISE bid on 64 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; M/s M.L Consortium won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.