Competitor profile

M.J.CONSTRUCTION

They win 10% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

47tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
42
47 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
38 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.4 Cr
of ₹151.3 Cr bid — 9.5% conversion
Win rate
9.5%
of 42 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count42 bids
90.5%
Awarded49.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost3890.5%
By value₹151.3 Cr
90.5%
Awarded₹14.4 Cr9.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹136.8 Cr90.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹14.4 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹14.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PYARIMOHAN PRADHAN0 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S SUMEET & ASSOCIATES2 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹11.7 Cr
won head-to-head
03
DHANESWAR SAHU2 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹3.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
SATYA PRAKASH AGRAWAL0 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MUKESH KUMAR1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹6.6 Cr
won head-to-head
06
SIDDHI VINAYAK CONSTRUCTIONS2 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹4.2 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.J.CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M.J.CONSTRUCTION

M.J.CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 47 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 42 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 9.5% win rate — worth ₹14.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE RW I, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against PYARIMOHAN PRADHAN, M/S SUMEET & ASSOCIATES and DHANESWAR SAHU. PYARIMOHAN PRADHAN bid on 21 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M.J.CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.