Competitor profile

M.G.ENGINEERING

They win 27% of what they bid, and 37% of the value they chase.

11tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
13 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
11
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹77.9 L
of ₹2.1 Cr bid — 36.8% conversion
Win rate
27.3%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
27.3%
63.6%
Awarded327.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected19.1%
Lost763.6%
By value₹2.1 Cr
36.8%
59.1%
Awarded₹77.9 L36.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.6 L4.1%
Lost₹1.3 Cr59.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

EIC-CIVIL₹31.5 L40.5%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹77.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS SAI ENGINEERING & COMPANY3 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹47.9 L
won head-to-head
02
SITARAM INFRA AND ENERGY PVT LTD1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹31.5 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S SOUDAMINI ELECTRICAL WORKS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹31.5 L
won head-to-head
04
JHADESWAR ELECTRICALS AND ERECTORS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
NARAYAN MAHANTA0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MAA TARINI ENGINEERING0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.G.ENGINEERING awardedOthers

About M.G.ENGINEERING

M.G.ENGINEERING appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 27.3% win rate — worth ₹77.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Orissa Lift Irrigation Corporation, at 59.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MS SAI ENGINEERING & COMPANY, SITARAM INFRA AND ENERGY PVT LTD and M/S SOUDAMINI ELECTRICAL WORKS. MS SAI ENGINEERING & COMPANY bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M.G.ENGINEERING won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.