Competitor profile

M/S. M.C. Electrical & Enterprises

They win 62% of what they bid, and 60% of the value they chase.

65tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
65
65 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
40
22 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹56.7 L
of ₹95.1 L bid — 59.6% conversion
Win rate
61.5%
of 65 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count65 bids
61.5%
33.8%
Awarded4061.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected34.6%
Lost2233.8%
By value₹95.1 L
59.6%
37.2%
Awarded₹56.7 L59.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.0 L3.2%
Lost₹35.4 L37.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

40 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
K.G.N. CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 55 shared tenders
₹8.0 L
won head-to-head
02
BRIGHT ENGG WORKS7 wins · 38 shared tenders
₹7.0 L
won head-to-head
03
MS/ M K ELECTRICAL REPAIRS5 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹12.5 L
won head-to-head
04
AZMAT ELECTRIC ENGG. WORKS0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
KRISHNA TECNO MART6 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹5.9 L
won head-to-head
06
ZED ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.C. Electrical awardedOthers

About M/S. M.C. Electrical & Enterprises

M/S. M.C. Electrical & Enterprises appears as a bidder on 65 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 65 decided bids, it was awarded 40 — a 61.5% win rate — worth ₹56.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Bharat Coking Coal Limited, at 95.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against K.G.N. CONSTRUCTION, BRIGHT ENGG WORKS and MS/ M K ELECTRICAL REPAIRS. K.G.N. CONSTRUCTION bid on 55 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S. M.C. Electrical & Enterprises won 38.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.