Competitor profile

M.BHAGYA LAXMI

They win 11% of what they bid, and 9% of the value they chase.

80tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
19 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
80
80 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
71 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹86.5 L
of ₹9.3 Cr bid — 9.3% conversion
Win rate
11.3%
of 80 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count80 bids
11.3%
88.8%
Awarded911.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost7188.8%
By value₹9.3 Cr
90.7%
Awarded₹86.5 L9.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹8.5 Cr90.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹86.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹86.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SANJAY KUMAR JAIN2 wins · 46 shared tenders
₹55.1 L
won head-to-head
02
MIHIR KUMAR SADANGI4 wins · 42 shared tenders
₹35.4 L
won head-to-head
03
SWAPNA BISOI3 wins · 31 shared tenders
₹44.9 L
won head-to-head
04
DILIP KUMAR NAYAK2 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹21.2 L
won head-to-head
05
AKASH BISSOI2 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹8.5 L
won head-to-head
06
PADMAN BISOI2 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹36.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.BHAGYA LAXMI awardedOthers

About M.BHAGYA LAXMI

M.BHAGYA LAXMI appears as a bidder on 80 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 80 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 11.3% win rate — worth ₹86.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE RW I, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SANJAY KUMAR JAIN, MIHIR KUMAR SADANGI and SWAPNA BISOI. SANJAY KUMAR JAIN bid on 46 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M.BHAGYA LAXMI won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.