Competitor profile

M A TRADERS

They win 20% of what they bid, but only 5% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
14 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
5
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.7 L
of ₹1.1 Cr bid — 5.1% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
20.0%
80.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected480.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹1.1 Cr
94.9%
Awarded₹5.7 L5.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 Cr94.9%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
H. D .M METAL0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
NIRALA SABJI BHANDAR1 win · 1 shared tender
₹14.1 L
won head-to-head
03
YADAV CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KHADIJA TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ASIF0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BAJRANG PACKING WORKS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM A TRADERS awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to M A TRADERS

About M A TRADERS

M A TRADERS appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹5.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Director General of Prisons and Correctional Services, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 476.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against H. D .M METAL, NIRALA SABJI BHANDAR and YADAV CONSTRUCTIONS. H. D .M METAL bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M A TRADERS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.