Competitor profile

M A M CAPS AND CLOSURES PVT LTD

They win 50% of what they bid, but only <0.1% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
26 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1,250
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
50.0%
25.0%
25.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹1.8 Cr
100.0%
Awarded₹1,2500.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.8 Cr100.0%
Lost₹10.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹1,250

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
CONTINENTAL CLOSURES3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1,263
won head-to-head
02
Swaashpet polymers private limited1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹6
won head-to-head
03
GM TAPE INDUSTRIES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
shri venketeshwara metal works1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹595
won head-to-head
05
SAJI C V1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SARAWATHI CLOTH STORES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹13
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM A M awardedOthers

About M A M CAPS AND CLOSURES PVT LTD

M A M CAPS AND CLOSURES PVT LTD appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1,250 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Travancore Sugars and Chemicals Ltd, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against CONTINENTAL CLOSURES, Swaashpet polymers private limited and GM TAPE INDUSTRIES. CONTINENTAL CLOSURES bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M A M CAPS AND CLOSURES PVT LTD won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.