Competitor profile

Luxe On Wheels

They win 33% of what they bid — and 46% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
14 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.1 L
of ₹6.7 L bid — 45.9% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹6.7 L
45.9%
54.1%
Awarded₹3.1 L45.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.6 L54.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹3.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PRADISH VASUDAVAN1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹42,000
won head-to-head
02
ADARSH S1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.1 L
won head-to-head
03
LUKHU FISAL1 win · 1 shared tender
₹39,750
won head-to-head
04
Ashik V A0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
JOBIN T JACOB1 win · 1 shared tender
₹48,000
won head-to-head
06
Pinchu M George0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLuxe On Wheels awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Luxe On Wheels

About Luxe On Wheels

Luxe On Wheels appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹3.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Office of the Commissioner of Food Safety Kerala, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against PRADISH VASUDAVAN, ADARSH S and LUKHU FISAL. PRADISH VASUDAVAN bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Luxe On Wheels won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.