Competitor profile

Limra Contraction And Suppliers

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 8% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
10 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹13.4 L
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 7.6% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded350.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost350.0%
By value₹1.8 Cr
92.4%
Awarded₹13.4 L7.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.6 Cr92.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HARA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹4,192
won head-to-head
02
RAMESH CHANDRA KALURAM KANTHED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
JAYANT CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
SETH SANWARIYA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Diwana Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
akramjaved0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLimra Contraction awardedOthers

About Limra Contraction And Suppliers

Limra Contraction And Suppliers appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹13.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against HARA CONSTRUCTION, RAMESH CHANDRA KALURAM KANTHED and JAYANT CONSTRUCTIONS. HARA CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Limra Contraction And Suppliers won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.