Competitor profile

Leading Edge Lab Equipments

They win 57% of what they bid — and 88% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

7tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
31 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 Cr
of ₹1.2 Cr bid — 88.1% conversion
Win rate
57.1%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
57.1%
42.9%
Awarded457.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost342.9%
By value₹1.2 Cr
88.1%
11.9%
Awarded₹1.1 Cr88.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹14.1 L11.9%

Where they win

3 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Hydraulic and Engineering Instrument0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Muthuraj0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
VIJAYALAKSHMI INDUSTRIES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Technical Teaching D Equipments0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹3.8 L
won head-to-head
06
GEOTRAN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLeading Edge awardedOthers

About Leading Edge Lab Equipments

Leading Edge Lab Equipments appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 57.1% win rate — worth ₹1.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Institute of Technology Puducherry, at 89.9% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Hydraulic and Engineering Instrument, Muthuraj and VIJAYALAKSHMI INDUSTRIES. Hydraulic and Engineering Instrument bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Leading Edge Lab Equipments won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.