Competitor profile

LAXMIKANTA NAYAK (S.T)

They win 13% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

105tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
3 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
105
105 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
14
87 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹91.4 L
of ₹5.2 Cr bid — 17.5% conversion
Win rate
13.3%
of 105 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count105 bids
13.3%
82.9%
Awarded1413.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected43.8%
Lost8782.9%
By value₹5.2 Cr
17.5%
10.8%
71.7%
Awarded₹91.4 L17.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹56.5 L10.8%
Lost₹3.8 Cr71.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹56.1 L61.3%
Municipal Bodies₹35.3 L38.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹91.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
CHANDRA HARIJAN4 wins · 58 shared tenders
₹11.4 L
won head-to-head
02
AKASH BISSOI6 wins · 55 shared tenders
₹24.2 L
won head-to-head
03
RAJKUMAR SATNAMI3 wins · 48 shared tenders
₹17.4 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S ABANI KUMAR MISHRA4 wins · 43 shared tenders
₹14.3 L
won head-to-head
05
Rameswar Gond2 wins · 41 shared tenders
₹7.2 L
won head-to-head
06
LAXMI NARAYAN BISSOI2 wins · 38 shared tenders
₹7.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLAXMIKANTA awardedOthers

About LAXMIKANTA NAYAK (S.T)

LAXMIKANTA NAYAK (S.T) appears as a bidder on 105 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 105 decided bids, it was awarded 14 — a 13.3% win rate — worth ₹91.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE RW I, at 61.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against CHANDRA HARIJAN, AKASH BISSOI and RAJKUMAR SATNAMI. CHANDRA HARIJAN bid on 58 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; LAXMIKANTA NAYAK (S.T) won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.