Competitor profile

M/s Laxmi Narayan Agarwal

They win 43% of what they bid, but only 4% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

23tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
23 Oct 2017last award
Total bids
21
23 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.4 Cr
of ₹277.1 Cr bid — 4.1% conversion
Win rate
42.9%
of 21 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count21 bids
42.9%
47.6%
Awarded942.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected29.5%
Lost1047.6%
By value₹277.1 Cr
45.8%
50.1%
Awarded₹11.4 Cr4.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹126.9 Cr45.8%
Lost₹138.8 Cr50.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹11.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
CAYA CONSTRUCTS0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHILPA CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S MEENU BUILDERS0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Lakhlan kurashi Const. Co.0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
G.S.Bansal and Company2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹4.9 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/s M. K. Constructions1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLaxmi Narayan awardedOthers

About M/s Laxmi Narayan Agarwal

M/s Laxmi Narayan Agarwal appears as a bidder on 23 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 21 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 42.9% win rate — worth ₹11.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Oct 2017.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DLB, at 62.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against CAYA CONSTRUCTS, SHILPA CONSTRUCTIONS and M/S MEENU BUILDERS. CAYA CONSTRUCTS bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s Laxmi Narayan Agarwal won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.