Competitor profile

Laxmi Machine Tools

They win 25% of what they bid — and 46% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
2 Jun 2022last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.0 L
of ₹8.7 L bid — 46.0% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
25.0%
25.0%
50.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹8.7 L
46.0%
12.7%
41.4%
Awarded₹4.0 L46.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 L12.7%
Lost₹3.6 L41.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
C. R. ENGINEERS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SRT Engineering Service0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
USHA ENGINEERING WORKS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹65,166
won head-to-head
04
FEBRICAD ENGINEERING1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹81,491
won head-to-head
05
Shri power technologies0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Graduate Agro and Mechanical Engineers0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLaxmi Machine awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Laxmi Machine

About Laxmi Machine Tools

Laxmi Machine Tools appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹4.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Jun 2022.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd., at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 126.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against C. R. ENGINEERS, SRT Engineering Service and USHA ENGINEERING WORKS. C. R. ENGINEERS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Laxmi Machine Tools won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.