Competitor profile

LAXMI CONSTRUCTION

They win 42% of what they bid, but only 21% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

12tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
7 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹31.5 L
of ₹1.5 Cr bid — 21.3% conversion
Win rate
41.7%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count12 bids
41.7%
16.7%
41.7%
Awarded541.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected216.7%
Lost541.7%
By value₹1.5 Cr
21.3%
71.9%
Awarded₹31.5 L21.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.1 L6.8%
Lost₹1.1 Cr71.9%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Divine Associates0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
P S CONSTRUCTION FATEHPUR FUTIYA2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹10.1 L
won head-to-head
03
YOGITA BUILDERS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹11.8 L
won head-to-head
04
DEEPAK KUMAR BORASI0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
BALAJI ENTERPRISE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
YASHI CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIERS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹44.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLAXMI CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About LAXMI CONSTRUCTION

LAXMI CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 41.7% win rate — worth ₹31.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 91.5% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Divine Associates, P S CONSTRUCTION FATEHPUR FUTIYA and YOGITA BUILDERS. Divine Associates bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; LAXMI CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.