Competitor profile

lal chand gardening enterprises

They win 25% of what they bid — and 37% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

9tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
4 Nov 2025last award
Total bids
8
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.3 Cr
of ₹6.1 Cr bid — 37.0% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
25.0%
62.5%
12.5%
Awarded225.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected562.5%
Lost112.5%
By value₹6.1 Cr
37.0%
42.1%
21.0%
Awarded₹2.3 Cr37.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.6 Cr42.1%
Lost₹1.3 Cr21.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹2.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
UNIQUE GARDEN SOLUTIONS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S SURESH JASWAL0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SHARMA ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹46.4 L
won head-to-head
04
SAAJ CREATION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S TRIDEV ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹7.2 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S NAGORI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedlal chand gardening awardedOthers

About lal chand gardening enterprises

lal chand gardening enterprises appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹2.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Nov 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rajasthan State Sports Council, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against UNIQUE GARDEN SOLUTIONS, M/S SURESH JASWAL and SHARMA ENTERPRISES. UNIQUE GARDEN SOLUTIONS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; lal chand gardening enterprises won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.