Competitor profile

kushal singh

They win 17% of what they bid, and 13% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
22 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.5 L
of ₹58.8 L bid — 12.8% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
16.7%
66.7%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost466.7%
By value₹58.8 L
12.8%
17.2%
70.0%
Awarded₹7.5 L12.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.1 L17.2%
Lost₹41.1 L70.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹7.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AMIT KUMAR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MOHAN SINGH THAKUR1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹6.7 L
won head-to-head
03
SHEESH KUMAR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹13.7 L
won head-to-head
04
Satish Kumar0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAKESH KUMAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ABC Construction1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedkushal singh awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to kushal singh

About kushal singh

kushal singh appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹7.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 29.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against AMIT KUMAR, MOHAN SINGH THAKUR and SHEESH KUMAR. AMIT KUMAR bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; kushal singh won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.