Competitor profile

Kuruvilla Mathew

They win 50% of what they bid — and 69% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
10 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹40.5 L
of ₹59.1 L bid — 68.5% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count10 bids
50.0%
10.0%
40.0%
Awarded550.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected110.0%
Lost440.0%
By value₹59.1 L
68.6%
28.6%
Awarded₹40.5 L68.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.7 L2.9%
Lost₹16.9 L28.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Local Self Government Department₹40.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹40.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHAIBU K JOHN1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹99,456
won head-to-head
02
BABU JOSEPH0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SAJAN P MATHEW0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SEENAMOL J1 win · 1 shared tender
₹8.5 L
won head-to-head
05
Tomy joseph1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.7 L
won head-to-head
06
VARGHESE MATHEW0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKuruvilla Mathew awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Kuruvilla Mathew

About Kuruvilla Mathew

Kuruvilla Mathew appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹40.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SHAIBU K JOHN, BABU JOSEPH and SAJAN P MATHEW. SHAIBU K JOHN bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Kuruvilla Mathew won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.