Competitor profile

KUMKUM DEVI

They win 23% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

39tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
39
39 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.6 Cr
of ₹20.8 Cr bid — 17.1% conversion
Win rate
23.1%
of 39 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count39 bids
23.1%
48.7%
28.2%
Awarded923.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1948.7%
Lost1128.2%
By value₹20.8 Cr
17.1%
55.5%
27.4%
Awarded₹3.6 Cr17.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹11.6 Cr55.5%
Lost₹5.7 Cr27.4%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

NREP Sahibganj₹78.3 L22.0%
UDD Secretary₹71.7 L20.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹3.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
LAL BABU YADAV4 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹2.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
ARVIND KUMAR YADAV2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
RAM LAL3 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
ANIL KUMAR YADAV1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹53.1 L
won head-to-head
05
PANKAJ KUMAR1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹59.9 L
won head-to-head
06
SHIVLAL INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKUMKUM DEVI awardedOthers

About KUMKUM DEVI

KUMKUM DEVI appears as a bidder on 39 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 39 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 23.1% win rate — worth ₹3.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is ZILA PARISHAD SAHIBGANJ, at 57.8% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against LAL BABU YADAV, ARVIND KUMAR YADAV and RAM LAL. LAL BABU YADAV bid on 21 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; KUMKUM DEVI won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.