Competitor profile

Kumar Mrinmoy Saikia

They win 75% of what they bid, but only 62% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
8 Mar 2025last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.6 L
of ₹17.0 L bid — 62.4% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹17.0 L
62.4%
37.6%
Awarded₹10.6 L62.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹6.4 L37.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KAUSHIK CHETRY1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹5.1 L
won head-to-head
02
RUBITA ENTERPRISE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
PARBIN SIDDIKI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
AMAR BORA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SAGAR CHETRY SUBEDI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Trinayan Enterprise0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKumar Mrinmoy awardedOthers

About Kumar Mrinmoy Saikia

Kumar Mrinmoy Saikia appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹10.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Mar 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is North Eastern Regional Institute of Water and Land Management, at 91.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against KAUSHIK CHETRY, RUBITA ENTERPRISE and PARBIN SIDDIKI. KAUSHIK CHETRY bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Kumar Mrinmoy Saikia won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.