Competitor profile

KULDEEP SINGH RANA

They win 13% of what they bid, and 13% of the value they chase.

15tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
10 Oct 2023last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹89.7 L
of ₹7.0 Cr bid — 12.8% conversion
Win rate
13.3%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count15 bids
13.3%
80.0%
Awarded213.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1280.0%
Lost16.7%
By value₹7.0 Cr
12.8%
81.9%
Awarded₹89.7 L12.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.7 Cr81.9%
Lost₹37.7 L5.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹89.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MUKESH PRASAD0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
KISHAN SINGH PANWAR0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
JAY CHAND SINGH PANWAR0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MADAN SINGH0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
GOVIND SINGH0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ABHISHEK BADONI0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKULDEEP SINGH awardedOthers

About KULDEEP SINGH RANA

KULDEEP SINGH RANA appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 13.3% win rate — worth ₹89.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Oct 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CGM (Drinking Water) Jal Sansthan, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MUKESH PRASAD, KISHAN SINGH PANWAR and JAY CHAND SINGH PANWAR. MUKESH PRASAD bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; KULDEEP SINGH RANA won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.