Competitor profile

kuldeep singh

They win 14% of what they bid — and 81% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

8tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
9 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
7
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 Cr
of ₹1.7 Cr bid — 81.1% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
14.3%
85.7%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost685.7%
By value₹1.7 Cr
81.1%
18.9%
Awarded₹1.4 Cr81.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹32.2 L18.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

University Department₹1.4 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Mamta Enterprises1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.2 L
won head-to-head
02
sunni kumar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S HARMOHINDER SINGH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S BISHAN DASS THAKUR CONTRACTOR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹7.0 L
won head-to-head
05
RAJ KUMAR SALGOTRA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.1 L
won head-to-head
06
RANJEET SHARMA GOVT CONT1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedkuldeep singh awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to kuldeep singh

About kuldeep singh

kuldeep singh appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹1.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is University Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 20.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Mamta Enterprises, sunni kumar and M/S HARMOHINDER SINGH. Mamta Enterprises bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; kuldeep singh won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.