Competitor profile

KS CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 32% of what they bid, and 26% of the value they chase.

31tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
28 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
28
31 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
17 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.0 Cr
of ₹7.6 Cr bid — 25.9% conversion
Win rate
32.1%
of 28 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count28 bids
32.1%
60.7%
Awarded932.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected27.1%
Lost1760.7%
By value₹7.6 Cr
25.9%
68.9%
Awarded₹2.0 Cr25.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹39.6 L5.2%
Lost₹5.2 Cr68.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

9 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
G.L.THIRUMALAI NAIDU AND COMPANY4 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹91.9 L
won head-to-head
02
Sri Aruna Associates3 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SIRITEL SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ARK Enterprises1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹16.9 L
won head-to-head
05
YOGAA MANPOWER AGENCY0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/SJAYAM CONSTRUCTIONS3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹63.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKS CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About KS CONSTRUCTIONS

KS CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 31 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 28 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 32.1% win rate — worth ₹2.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against G.L.THIRUMALAI NAIDU AND COMPANY, Sri Aruna Associates and SIRITEL SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED. G.L.THIRUMALAI NAIDU AND COMPANY bid on 19 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; KS CONSTRUCTIONS won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.