Competitor profile

M/s Krishna Construction Company

They win 11% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.9 Cr
of ₹48.6 Cr bid — 8.0% conversion
Win rate
11.1%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
11.1%
11.1%
77.8%
Awarded111.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected111.1%
Lost777.8%
By value₹48.6 Cr
38.0%
54.0%
Awarded₹3.9 Cr8.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹18.5 Cr38.0%
Lost₹26.2 Cr54.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹3.9 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PREM SINGH2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹10.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
NEW INDIA CONTRACTOR AND DEVELOPERS3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Nav Bharat Construction Company0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
hardik construction company0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
H. C. Bansal Engg. & Contt.0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Rashid Ali Civil Contractor0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKrishna Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Krishna Construction Company

M/s Krishna Construction Company appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 11.1% win rate — worth ₹3.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against PREM SINGH, NEW INDIA CONTRACTOR AND DEVELOPERS and Nav Bharat Construction Company. PREM SINGH bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/s Krishna Construction Company won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.