Competitor profile

M/s Krishna Construction

They win 23% of what they bid, but only 8% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

13tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
10 Apr 2025last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.7 L
of ₹1.3 Cr bid — 7.6% conversion
Win rate
23.1%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count13 bids
23.1%
15.4%
61.5%
Awarded323.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected215.4%
Lost861.5%
By value₹1.3 Cr
89.1%
Awarded₹9.7 L7.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.3 L3.3%
Lost₹1.1 Cr89.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Aliya Construction0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
J.K. ELECTRICALS2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹3.6 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s Md Nisar Ahmad0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S SHAHBAZ GROUP2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹32.9 L
won head-to-head
05
PARVEZ RASHID0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s Shakil Ansari1 win · 1 shared tender
₹8.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKrishna Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Krishna Construction

M/s Krishna Construction appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 23.1% win rate — worth ₹9.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Apr 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Eastern Coalfields Limited, at 79.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Aliya Construction, J.K. ELECTRICALS and M/s Md Nisar Ahmad. M/s Aliya Construction bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s Krishna Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.