Competitor profile

Kiyehoto Sumi-M/s. Jordan Construction

They won all 4 of their bids with a result, worth ₹28.0 Cr.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
21 Feb 2012last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹28.0 Cr
of ₹28.0 Cr bid — 100.0% conversion
Win rate
100.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
100.0%
Awarded4100.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹28.0 Cr
100.0%
Awarded₹28.0 Cr100.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Nagaland CE-PMGSY₹28.0 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Kudecho Khamo0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
PUKHATO SHOHE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
K Asangla Jamir0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
N.R.zeliang Rangkau0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
keneizhakho nakhro0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKiyehoto Sumi-M/s. awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Kiyehoto Sumi-M/s.

About Kiyehoto Sumi-M/s. Jordan Construction

Kiyehoto Sumi-M/s. Jordan Construction appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 100.0% win rate — worth ₹28.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Feb 2012.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Nagaland CE-PMGSY, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Kudecho Khamo, PUKHATO SHOHE and K Asangla Jamir. Kudecho Khamo bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Kiyehoto Sumi-M/s. Jordan Construction won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.