Competitor profile

KISHORI LAL SHARMA

They win 21% of what they bid — and 31% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

34tenders on record
11buyer authorities
1state
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
34
34 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 Cr
of ₹4.7 Cr bid — 31.2% conversion
Win rate
20.6%
of 34 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count34 bids
20.6%
35.3%
44.1%
Awarded720.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1235.3%
Lost1544.1%
By value₹4.7 Cr
31.2%
51.0%
17.9%
Awarded₹1.5 Cr31.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.4 Cr51.0%
Lost₹83.9 L17.9%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹69.7 L47.6%
DC Office Nahan₹3.1 L2.1%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VARUN RATTAN GOVT. CONTRACTOR0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
ADITYA TRAVEL SERVICES1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹55,200
won head-to-head
03
Rakesh Kumar1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹3.2 L
won head-to-head
04
arnav construction0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Vipin Sharma1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹7.0 L
won head-to-head
06
Vijay Sharma0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKISHORI LAL awardedOthers

About KISHORI LAL SHARMA

KISHORI LAL SHARMA appears as a bidder on 34 government tenders on record, from 11 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 34 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 20.6% win rate — worth ₹1.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 47.6% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against VARUN RATTAN GOVT. CONTRACTOR, ADITYA TRAVEL SERVICES and Rakesh Kumar. VARUN RATTAN GOVT. CONTRACTOR bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; KISHORI LAL SHARMA won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.