Competitor profile

KIRTIMAN TRADERS

They win 11% of what they bid, and 9% of the value they chase.

98tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
94
98 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
82 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.1 Cr
of ₹32.5 Cr bid — 9.5% conversion
Win rate
10.6%
of 94 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count94 bids
10.6%
87.2%
Awarded1010.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected22.1%
Lost8287.2%
By value₹32.5 Cr
86.4%
Awarded₹3.1 Cr9.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.3 Cr4.1%
Lost₹28.1 Cr86.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

10 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PD GUPTA AND COMPANY3 wins · 33 shared tenders
₹66.8 L
won head-to-head
02
TANISHQ ENTERPRISES5 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Shree Sai Ram Enterprises4 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
VIPUL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY1 win · 20 shared tenders
₹32.0 L
won head-to-head
05
MITTAL ENTERPRISES2 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹61.6 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S JAGDISH PRASAD AIRUN1 win · 18 shared tenders
₹35.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKIRTIMAN TRADERS awardedOthers

About KIRTIMAN TRADERS

KIRTIMAN TRADERS appears as a bidder on 98 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 94 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 10.6% win rate — worth ₹3.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 14.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against PD GUPTA AND COMPANY, TANISHQ ENTERPRISES and Shree Sai Ram Enterprises. PD GUPTA AND COMPANY bid on 33 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; KIRTIMAN TRADERS won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.