Competitor profile

Kirpa Associates

They win 83% of what they bid, and 78% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
21 Nov 2025last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.6 Cr
of ₹18.8 Cr bid — 77.9% conversion
Win rate
83.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
83.3%
16.7%
Awarded583.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost116.7%
By value₹18.8 Cr
77.9%
22.1%
Awarded₹14.6 Cr77.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹4.2 Cr22.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S hargyan singh shivpuri1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹4.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
SURYA ROAD LINES1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹4.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
NEW PERFECT DISTRIBUTORS1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹4.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
GUPTA TRASNPORT COMPANY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
m.k. traders0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S Heliacal Energies1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.9 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKirpa Associates awardedOthers

About Kirpa Associates

Kirpa Associates appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 83.3% win rate — worth ₹14.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Nov 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Hindustan Urvarak and Rasayan Limited, at 88.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S hargyan singh shivpuri, SURYA ROAD LINES and NEW PERFECT DISTRIBUTORS. M/S hargyan singh shivpuri bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Kirpa Associates won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.