Competitor profile

KINGS SECURITIES SERVICES

They win 31% of what they bid, and 23% of the value they chase.

13tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
19 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹71.7 L
of ₹3.1 Cr bid — 23.1% conversion
Win rate
30.8%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count13 bids
30.8%
30.8%
38.5%
Awarded430.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected430.8%
Lost538.5%
By value₹3.1 Cr
23.1%
76.3%
Awarded₹71.7 L23.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.4 Cr76.3%
Lost₹2.1 L0.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Forest - PCCF (HoFF)₹70.7 L98.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹71.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
mitra security services0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHARMA LABOUR SUPPLIERS2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹47,432
won head-to-head
03
Navdeep Enterprises1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹6,553
won head-to-head
04
₹7.6 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s RAJASTHAN LABOUR SERVICE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MAA NAGNECHI SECURITY SERVICE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKINGS SECURITIES awardedOthers

About KINGS SECURITIES SERVICES

KINGS SECURITIES SERVICES appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 30.8% win rate — worth ₹71.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Forest - PCCF (HoFF), at 98.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against mitra security services, SHARMA LABOUR SUPPLIERS and Navdeep Enterprises. mitra security services bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; KINGS SECURITIES SERVICES won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.