Competitor profile

KHAN TECHNO CITY

They win 67% of what they bid, and 76% of the value they chase.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
31 Oct 2024last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹43.3 L
of ₹56.7 L bid — 76.4% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded266.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected133.3%
Lost00.0%
By value₹56.7 L
76.4%
23.6%
Awarded₹43.3 L76.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹13.4 L23.6%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MK ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
TEAM TWO1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹13.4 L
won head-to-head
03
opinder pal singh0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Abijeet Singh0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
AYAAN AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Express Technology0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKHAN TECHNO awardedOthers

About KHAN TECHNO CITY

KHAN TECHNO CITY appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹43.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Oct 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is YOUTH SERVICES AND SPORTS, at 58.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MK ENTERPRISES, TEAM TWO and opinder pal singh. MK ENTERPRISES bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; KHAN TECHNO CITY won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.