Competitor profile

Khalsa Gymnastic Works

They win 67% of what they bid, and 75% of the value they chase.

3tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
17 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.3 L
of ₹19.0 L bid — 75.3% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded266.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected133.3%
Lost00.0%
By value₹19.0 L
75.3%
24.7%
Awarded₹14.3 L75.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.7 L24.7%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹14.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Little Care and Play1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹4.7 L
won head-to-head
02
United Marketing Sports Emporium0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Vigil Equipments & Clothing0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SPINE ORTHOSIS AND PROSTHESIS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
EXCEL ENGINEERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKhalsa Gymnastic awardedOthers

About Khalsa Gymnastic Works

Khalsa Gymnastic Works appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹14.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Secretary Kannur District Panchayat, at 72.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Little Care and Play, United Marketing Sports Emporium and Vigil Equipments & Clothing. Little Care and Play bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Khalsa Gymnastic Works won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.