Competitor profile

KETHAKI ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION

They win 6% of what they bid, and 5% of the value they chase.

47tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
12 May 2026last award
Total bids
47
47 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
43 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹77.9 L
of ₹15.7 Cr bid — 5.0% conversion
Win rate
6.4%
of 47 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count47 bids
91.5%
Awarded36.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.1%
Lost4391.5%
By value₹15.7 Cr
88.7%
Awarded₹77.9 L5.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹99.8 L6.4%
Lost₹13.9 Cr88.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S RAHUL CONSTRUCTION1 win · 35 shared tenders
₹99.8 L
won head-to-head
02
S K ENGINEERING WORKS0 wins · 35 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S SADASHIV ENTERPRISES0 wins · 30 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S PALEI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 28 shared tenders
₹57.5 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S M H ZAMAN2 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹85.6 L
won head-to-head
06
M/s P.K.RAY2 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹47.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKETHAKI ENGINEERING awardedOthers

About KETHAKI ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION

KETHAKI ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 47 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 47 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 6.4% win rate — worth ₹77.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Aluminium Company Limited,NALCO, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 19.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S RAHUL CONSTRUCTION, S K ENGINEERING WORKS and M/S SADASHIV ENTERPRISES. M/S RAHUL CONSTRUCTION bid on 35 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; KETHAKI ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.