Competitor profile

KAT Engineering

They win 50% of what they bid, and 52% of the value they chase.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
8 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.6 L
of ₹20.4 L bid — 52.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
50.0%
25.0%
25.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹20.4 L
52.0%
48.0%
Awarded₹10.6 L52.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹9.8 L48.0%
Lost₹700.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

State Farming Corporation of Kerala Ltd₹10.6 L100.0%
Travancore Sugars and Chemicals Ltd₹730.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹10.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
E.I.D. PARRY (INDIA) LTD.2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹138
won head-to-head
02
sampathk2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹138
won head-to-head
03
CC FABS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹9.8 L
won head-to-head
04
CSG CONSTRUCTIONS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹138
won head-to-head
05
Karthik Agro Industries Private Limited1 win · 1 shared tender
₹65
won head-to-head
06
HERMES DISTILLERY PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKAT Engineering awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to KAT Engineering

About KAT Engineering

KAT Engineering appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹10.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is State Farming Corporation of Kerala Ltd, at 100.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against E.I.D. PARRY (INDIA) LTD., sampathk and CC FABS. E.I.D. PARRY (INDIA) LTD. bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; KAT Engineering won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.