Competitor profile

KASEEMP

They win 29% of what they bid — and 44% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

17tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹12.7 L
of ₹28.9 L bid — 44.2% conversion
Win rate
29.4%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count17 bids
29.4%
64.7%
Awarded529.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected15.9%
Lost1164.7%
By value₹28.9 L
44.2%
14.4%
41.4%
Awarded₹12.7 L44.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.2 L14.4%
Lost₹12.0 L41.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹11.4 L89.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹12.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAKKARIYA P4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹1.9 L
won head-to-head
02
P. R. RIJESH2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.4 L
won head-to-head
03
SHAHUL HAMEED V0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
YAHKOOB M K1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.8 L
won head-to-head
05
chandran kv0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
JAHFAR K0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKASEEMP awardedOthers

About KASEEMP

KASEEMP appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 29.4% win rate — worth ₹12.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 89.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAKKARIYA P, P. R. RIJESH and SHAHUL HAMEED V. SAKKARIYA P bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; KASEEMP won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.