Competitor profile

KANWAL KUMAR GUPTA

They win 25% of what they bid, and 22% of the value they chase.

64tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
19 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
59
64 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
15
37 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.1 Cr
of ₹19.0 Cr bid — 21.8% conversion
Win rate
25.4%
of 59 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count59 bids
25.4%
11.9%
62.7%
Awarded1525.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected711.9%
Lost3762.7%
By value₹19.0 Cr
21.8%
71.4%
Awarded₹4.1 Cr21.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.3 Cr6.8%
Lost₹13.5 Cr71.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

15 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Anil Engineers & Builders16 wins · 36 shared tenders
₹4.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
NATIONAL TRADING COMPANY0 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S IMRAN MAJID1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹34.6 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S Ramesh Chander Gandotra & Sons1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹30.6 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s Mool Raj Ramesh Chander1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹31.0 L
won head-to-head
06
VIJAY KUMAR SURI AND SONS1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹4.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKANWAL KUMAR awardedOthers

About KANWAL KUMAR GUPTA

KANWAL KUMAR GUPTA appears as a bidder on 64 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 59 decided bids, it was awarded 15 — a 25.4% win rate — worth ₹4.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Anil Engineers & Builders, NATIONAL TRADING COMPANY and M/S IMRAN MAJID. M/s Anil Engineers & Builders bid on 36 of the same tenders and won 16 of them; KANWAL KUMAR GUPTA won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.