Competitor profile

M/S KANHAY MAHTO

They win 10% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

91tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
16 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
91
91 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
22 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹17.8 L
of ₹3.0 Cr bid — 5.9% conversion
Win rate
9.9%
of 91 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count91 bids
65.9%
24.2%
Awarded99.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected6065.9%
Lost2224.2%
By value₹3.0 Cr
59.4%
34.6%
Awarded₹17.8 L5.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.8 Cr59.4%
Lost₹1.0 Cr34.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

9 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Shri Ram Enterprises59 wins · 68 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s Techno CUb8 wins · 68 shared tenders
₹24.6 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S MANOJ ENTERPRISES3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹5.2 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S HIND ENTERPRISES1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹1.8 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S RAJU ENGINEERING WORKS5 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹11.1 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S ADARSH ENTERPRISES0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKANHAY MAHTO awardedOthers

About M/S KANHAY MAHTO

M/S KANHAY MAHTO appears as a bidder on 91 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 91 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 9.9% win rate — worth ₹17.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Central Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Shri Ram Enterprises, M/s Techno CUb and M/S MANOJ ENTERPRISES. M/s Shri Ram Enterprises bid on 68 of the same tenders and won 59 of them; M/S KANHAY MAHTO won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.