Competitor profile

M/S KAMLA ASSOCIATES

They win 67% of what they bid, and 62% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
24 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
6
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.8 Cr
of ₹9.4 Cr bid — 62.3% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
66.7%
16.7%
16.7%
Awarded466.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost116.7%
By value₹9.4 Cr
62.3%
19.9%
17.8%
Awarded₹5.8 Cr62.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.9 Cr19.9%
Lost₹1.7 Cr17.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹5.8 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹5.8 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
CHANDRAMAULESHWAR ASSOCIATES1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Ms Kay Kay Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
HILL VIEW CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S AAA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PURNA NAND CHAMOLI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Mahveer Singh Aswal0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKAMLA ASSOCIATES awardedOthers

About M/S KAMLA ASSOCIATES

M/S KAMLA ASSOCIATES appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹5.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against CHANDRAMAULESHWAR ASSOCIATES, Ms Kay Kay Construction and HILL VIEW CONSTRUCTION. CHANDRAMAULESHWAR ASSOCIATES bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S KAMLA ASSOCIATES won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.