Competitor profile

Kamal Traders

They win 8% of what they bid, and 13% of the value they chase.

51tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
24 Feb 2026last award
Total bids
51
51 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
20 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.2 Cr
of ₹46.3 Cr bid — 13.3% conversion
Win rate
7.8%
of 51 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count51 bids
52.9%
39.2%
Awarded47.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2752.9%
Lost2039.2%
By value₹46.3 Cr
13.3%
58.7%
27.9%
Awarded₹6.2 Cr13.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹27.2 Cr58.7%
Lost₹12.9 Cr27.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹6.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MUSKAN ASSOCIATES6 wins · 30 shared tenders
₹3.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Supra Electrical18 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹4.5 Cr
won head-to-head
03
MITTAL MACHINES PVT LTD1 win · 21 shared tenders
₹88.5 L
won head-to-head
04
Shiv Pratap Singh Pundir4 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Katsons Technologies Private Limited0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MAHABIR SINGH KATHAIT3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹94.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKamal Traders awardedOthers

About Kamal Traders

Kamal Traders appears as a bidder on 51 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 51 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 7.8% win rate — worth ₹6.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Feb 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 95.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MUSKAN ASSOCIATES, Supra Electrical and MITTAL MACHINES PVT LTD. MUSKAN ASSOCIATES bid on 30 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; Kamal Traders won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.