Competitor profile

M/S KAILASH KUMAR SHARMA

They win 39% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

32tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
6 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
31
32 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹19.5 Cr
of ₹56.9 Cr bid — 34.3% conversion
Win rate
38.7%
of 31 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count31 bids
38.7%
54.8%
Awarded1238.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1754.8%
Lost26.5%
By value₹56.9 Cr
34.3%
61.0%
Awarded₹19.5 Cr34.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹34.7 Cr61.0%
Lost₹2.7 Cr4.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹19.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S ANIL KUMAR GUPTA3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹3.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
O.P. Gupta Constructions Pvt Ltd2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹6.5 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S MOHD YAMIN0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s S.P. Agarwal and Co.2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹4.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
SAFEENA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s Naresh Singhals And Co3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹7.9 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKAILASH KUMAR awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to KAILASH KUMAR

About M/S KAILASH KUMAR SHARMA

M/S KAILASH KUMAR SHARMA appears as a bidder on 32 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 31 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 38.7% win rate — worth ₹19.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 6 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S ANIL KUMAR GUPTA, O.P. Gupta Constructions Pvt Ltd and M/S MOHD YAMIN. M/S ANIL KUMAR GUPTA bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/S KAILASH KUMAR SHARMA won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.